(　↓　Translation with the machine)
4. 3 levels of the fact

*****back


In this way, it is the thing that "there is" the world regardless of human recognition.
The person recognizes the world.

The born person ties it to "the words" that got the characteristic of the thing in this world that I caught with a sensor of the human body from others.

"The words" "are figures".
The born person breaks into the world of innumerable "words".

However, it is the world of <"words"＞ の inspection,
It is not talked in a loud voice


The top and bottom of the social structure is, for example, the world of <"words"＞Then I am shown clearly.
However, in "the world of the aerial photo ," such a thing does not exist.

Then "is this "world of the aerial photo" a fact?"
"The top and bottom" of the social structure "will be a fact" for the person adversely.

Even if, "in fact ," I say to a mouthful in this way, a hierarchy seems to be in "the fact".

What is the hierarchy of "the fact?"
It is the hierarchy where it occurs because of an object to focus on when a person recognizes it.

"A fact" has 3 levels.

(１) Regardless of human recognition, I exist by a property of itself.

The world that has stopped a human being being going to feel a meaning, and being going to recognize it by words intentionally.
The absolute world that is dependent on only the property of the material.

(２) A human being recognized "the thing that a material was certain existentially" and expressed it by words.

For example, I express it when there is a PC in front, and "there is a PC in front".
It "a fact."
However, it is not a fact when I express it when "there is a PC in front" in front though there is not a PC.

Between the material actual situation and human recognition, there is correspondence.
The science is poured here when I go by a big classification

(３) The human subjective social promise that was supported by information system.

Assuming "a fact of the outbreak of the joint ownership recognition about a certain matter ,"

Backed by social compelling force,

In implication "to plan mutual realization of the joint ownership recognition that occurred", it is used as "a fact" without correspondence with the actual situation.

＊I can express these three phases in other words as follows.
(１) The world that does not assume は, the recognition main constituent.
(２) The world called は, one person and the world.
(３) は, the world of the mutual relations of a large number of people


But with "the information system" to say in (3),

I say the situation that a person has by joint ownership recognition and supports to "semantic structure of the social information" hammered in into the recognition of the human brain.

The concept of the social viewpoint with the prime minister or the president.
The concept of the organization with the government or a company.
A concept of the economy such as exchange and the stock prices or the price.
A concept called the possession.

(come) Than my book "3 levels of the fact"